HDM-4 Version 2.03 Upgrade is now available free to registered HDM-4 Version 2 licence holders by downloading from the HDMGlobal website. The upgrade is aimed at resolving a number of issues that affect the results of the software.
The new issues that are included in the upgrade are indicated below:
1) ENERGY CONSUMPTION: The calculation of the energy consumption of
work items did not correctly use the energy units in which the
usage was defined.
2) ENERGY CONSUMPTION: The Energy Usage defined for an improvement
reconstruction was used to calculate the energy usage for a
maintenance reconstruction work item. This error has been
corrected.
3) MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS: The data used in MCA if the "Comfort"
criterion was selected, and the mode of analysis was "analysis
by section" was not correct. This has been corrected.
4) MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS: The multi-criteria analysis did not take
account of which criterion was selected as the base criterion.
This could lead to incorrect results. This has been corrected.
5) RUNDATA: The average IRI for a section over the analysis period is
not calculated correctly. This has been corrected.
6) WORK ITEMS: The works quantity for the maintenance reconstruction
work item was being reported as 0 m^2. This has been corrected and
the correct area of reconstruction is now reported.
7) ASSET VALUATION: The units for the replacement cost was not
indicated. The message has been improved to state that the
replacement cost is for the whole section.
8) DEFAULT WORK COSTS: The maximum cost for the work items has been
increased to allow a larger default cost to be entered.
9) DEFAULT WORK & ENERGY COSTS: The units for the energy usage could
not be changed. This has now been corrected.
10) DEFAULT WORK & ENERGY COSTS: The classification of the operations
has been improved by clearly identifying the maintenance and
improvement items.
11) MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS: The results dialog for Multi-criteria
Analysis (MCA) did not display the project alternative/section
alternative name so it was difficult to interpret the results.
The display of the results has been improved to display the name
of the alternative in the column header and as a tool-tip.
12) IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: The operation types NMT Lane Addition, and
NMT Lane Upgrading do not require the user to define a traffic
flow period. However, the analysis input validation states
that one must be defined. This error has now been corrected.
13) PROGRAMME ANALYSIS: The scrollbar in the grid displaying the
sections within a group was not adjusted for the number of
selected/available sections. This has been corrected.
This version also includes the update in HDM-4 v2.02:
1) WORK ITEMS: The preparatory work quantities and costs were incorrectly calculated for resealing, overlay, and inlay operation
types. This resulted in the preparatory costs being many times
higher than expected, therefore effecting the results of the
economic analysis of studies. These errors have now been corrected
and it is recommended that studies are re-run to determine the
impact of the corrected calculations.
2) ASSET VALUATION: An omission was found in the Asset Valuation
specification which resulted in the asset value of a pavement
being incorrectly computed following an improvement standard. The
specification has been amended and the software implementation
updated accordingly.
3) ALTERNATIVES INTERFACE: Double-clicking on an improvement standard
assignments name to display the details could result in the system
crashing in some situations. This has been corrected.
4) ASSET VALUATION: Some input values were limited to 99.99%. This
has been corrected to allow the user to enter values between 0 and
100%
5) ASSET VALUATION: The component age year was not set to a default
value when a new section was created. This resulted in an error
message when the user moved away from the screen even if they made
no changes. This parameter is now initialised but should be
reviewed by the user when entering asset valuation data.
6) IMPORT EXPORT: For unsealed work items the final gravel thickness
and initial roughness parameters were not being imported/exported
correctly. This has been corrected.
7) IMPORT: When importing work standards the option to overwite all
New Construction Section was displaying an incorrect message
prompt, and did not operate correctly. This has been corrected.
8) NEW CONSTRUCTION SECTIONS: It was not possible to change the new
construction section's Accident Class. This has now been
corrected.
9) VEHICLE FLEET: If the user had not defined some text for a vehicle
type's description an error would be received when importing or
exporting the vehicle fleet. This error has been corrected.
10) DATA MIGRATION TOOL: If the original workspace had a vehicle
fleet in which a vehicle type did not have any text defined for
its description field an error would be generated during the
migration process, and the vehicle fleet and associated data
would not be migrated correctly. This error has been corrected.
This version also includes the update in HDM-4 v2.01:
1) DATA MIGRATION TOOL: The conversion of new Roughness
calibration factors are not treated consistently in
calibration and work items. The tool has been updated to ensure
the factors are treated consistently and are initialised with a
default value of 1.0.
2) WORKSPACE: Using the 'Recent Workspaces' menu item to select a
previously opened workspace caused a system error. This has been
fixed.
3) ROAD NETWORK: Only an integer number could be entered for the
section's vehicle AADTs on systems that had a regional setting
using a comma for a decimal separator. This error has been
corrected.
4) ROAD NETWORK: In certain circumstances, changing a sections
surface class would cause HDM-4 to crash. This error has been
corrected.
5) ROAD NETWORK: After changing a section's surface class no
condition data was present. This error has been corrected.
6) ROAD NETWORK: For a bituminous section, after selecting
method [2] to calculate SNP the results were not shown and
method [1] remained selected. This error has now been corrected.
7) ALTERNATIVES INTERFACE: It was not possible to deselect the
inclusion of generated traffic and benefits and costs associated
with an improvement standard. This error has been corrected.
8) ALTERNATIVES: After changing the start year for a New Section,
its name was incorrectly displayed in the alternatives navigation
pane. This error has been corrected.
9) MULTI-YEAR FORWARD PROGRAMMING: The salvage value was not being
calculated and included in the analysis. This error has now been
corrected.
10) MULTI-YEAR FORWARD PROGRAMMING: When performing a MYFP with
economic analysis the Road User Costs where not being calculated
correctly. This resulted in incorrect economic indicator and work
programme results. This error has now been corrected.
11) BUDGET OPTIMISATION: Analyses that exceeded the limits for
performing budget optimisation using the EBM-32 method (see HDM-4
documentation for more details) did not produce the desired
optimisation results. This error has now been fixed.
|